Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41860971›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Has the establishment of national parks improved nature-based tourism experiences? Evidence from social media data.

Yi Li, Yitong Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yi LiCollege of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Yitong YangCollege of Economics and Management, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9840-9221

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

National parks are vital institutions for conserving biodiversity and preserving biocultural heritage that safeguard exceptional natural resources and sustain key cultural ecosystem services (CESs), such as aesthetic appreciation, nature-based recreation, and environmental education. However, the essentially subjective and intangible characteristics of CESs are obstacles to effectively collecting data and measuring their diverse values. This study developed a supply-support-demand framework for analyzing nature-based tourism in national parks, using Giant Panda National Park, one of China's earliest national parks, as the case study site for the years 2009-2023. To investigate the impact of national park establishment, we employed a difference-in-differences (DID) approach to assess its effects on counties within national parks. We found that tactile and visual impressions play a key role in shaping visitors' experiences, whereas olfactory, gustatory, and auditory perceptions exhibit cooccurring, supportive influences on visual and tactile impressions, as revealed through the rich expressions captured in social interactions. The establishment of national parks has the potential to enhance nature-based tourism experiences by increasing local fiscal expenditure and expanding the tourism industry. The effects exhibit clear regional heterogeneity and differences in policy intensity. At the regional level, Sichuan and Shaanxi, regions with relatively stronger infrastructure and resource endowments, show better improvement in nature-based tourism experiences, whereas Gansu shows an insignificant effect. In terms of policy intensity, stronger interventions are accompanied by stricter ecological protection constraints. As a result, the improvement in nature-based tourism experiences is significantly greater in the low-intensity policy group than in the high-intensity policy group.

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesParks, RecreationalSocial MediaTourismAnimalsBiodiversityChinaEcosystemHumansRecreationUrsidae

Identifiers

PMID41860971
PMCPMC13004529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.