Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41860944›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Contextual inference through flexible integration of environmental features and behavioural outcomes.

Jessica Passlack, Andrew F MacAskill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jessica PasslackDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1043-3980
Andrew F MacAskillDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0196-3779

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to use context to flexibly adjust our decision-making is vital for navigating a complex world. To do this, the brain must both use environmental features and behavioural outcomes to distinguish between different, often hidden contexts; and also learn how to use these inferred contexts to guide behaviour. However, how these two interacting processes can be performed simultaneously remains unclear. Within the brain it is thought that interaction between the prefrontal cortex (PFC) and hippocampus (HPC) supports contextual inference. We show that models using environmental features (similar to those proposed to be implemented in hippocampus) readily support context-specific behaviour, but struggle to differentiate ambiguous contexts during learning. In contrast, models using behavioural outcomes (similar to those proposed in PFC) can stably differentiate contexts during periods of learning, but struggle to guide context-specific behaviour. We show that supporting feature-based with outcome-based strategies during learning overcomes the limitations of both approaches, allowing for the formation of distinct contextual representations that support contextual inference. Moreover, agents using this joint approach reproduce both behavioural- and cellular-level phenomena associated with the interaction between PFC and HPC. Together, these results provide insight into how the brain uses contextual information to guide flexible behaviour.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHippocampusLearningModels, NeurologicalPrefrontal CortexAnimalsComputational BiologyEnvironmentHumans

Identifiers

PMID41860944
PMCPMC13029755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.