ArticlePloS one2026
Development of a survey and worry score to evaluate physician burnout and wellness interventions during COVID-19 in the Rio Grande Valley: A pilot study.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCurrent research on physician burnout is limited in rural communities and physicians caring for the medically underserved. This study aimed to create an instrument to quantify the rate of physician burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify effective coping interventions in an underserved mixed rural-urban region along the Texas-Mexico border.
methodsWe conducted a regional study in a sample of US physicians using a structured questionnaire developed by a multidisciplinary group. Thirty-one participants were contacted over a five-week period between December 2022 to January 2023. Participants self-selected based on their experiences of burnout during various phases of the COVID-19 pandemic (e.g., Initial Surge, Lock Down, Adjustment Period, Vaccine Distribution, Delta Variant, Booster Available). A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess and rank the perceived effectiveness of services employed to cope with burnout and its negative implications.
resultsWe found that 43% of participants experienced burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic, with flexible schedules and personal wellness being the top alleviators of burnout. The survey showed good internal consistency and reliability (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.7680), McDonald's omega was 0.80, and identified three "worry types" through latent factor analysis. Worry types included: (1) physicians with a desire to self-preserve but showed negative coping, (2) physicians with a desire for occupational harmony but with concerns about patient safety, and (3) physicians with concerns about personal safety and their mortality potential. Additionally, latent factor analysis showed that 9 questions from the survey could be used to create a Worry Score to classify burnout and coping strategies related to the COVID-19 pandemic.
conclusionThese findings suggest that healthcare administrators and policymakers should prioritize implementing and promoting flexible work schedules and opportunities for personal time as part of comprehensive strategies to improve physician wellness and mitigate burnout. Additional research is needed to determine the effectiveness of the interventions in addressing physician burnout.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.