Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41860887›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

A socio-ecological approach to the determinants of animal health management: A scoping review.

Lisa Vors, Fanny Debil, Legrand Saint-Cyr, Anthony Giacomini, Nicolas Fortané, Guillaume Lhermie

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lisa VorsCIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier, France, ASTRE, CIRAD, INRAE, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, Université de Toulouse, ENVT, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0359-728X
Fanny DebilDirection Science sociales, Economie et Société, ANSES, Paris, France.
Legrand Saint-CyrDirection Science sociales, Economie et Société, ANSES, Paris, France.
Anthony GiacominiCIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier, France, ASTRE, CIRAD, INRAE, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, Université de Toulouse, ENVT, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9298-3370
Nicolas FortanéIRISSO, INRAE, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, France.
Guillaume LhermieCIRAD, UMR ASTRE, Montpellier, France, ASTRE, CIRAD, INRAE, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, Université de Toulouse, ENVT, Toulouse, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2538-1586

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With approximately 60% of human infectious diseases originating from zoonotic sources, an integrated approach to animal health management is critical. Significant barriers persist in optimizing disease control strategies, particularly regarding diagnostics, surveillance, biosecurity, and vaccination systems. Beyond technical and health-related aspects, socio-economic factors substantially influence both adoption and efficacy of intervention measures. While these determinants have been increasingly explored through integration of social sciences, such as economics, sociology, political science, into veterinary public health, most research remains confined to individual-level assessments focusing on epidemiological aspects and behavioral determinants, often neglecting broader social dynamics governing decision-making processes. Thus, this study develops a novel typology of determinants affecting the adoption of disease management measures using the socio-ecological model framework. We refer to these as "applicability factors", defined as elements that either facilitate or hinder the implementation of animal health management measures. A scoping review was conducted to refine the classification of these factors, leading to the identification of 22,683 articles, of which 593 were analyzed. The scoping review was performed in accordance with the methodology defined by the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Five key factors emerged: (1) individual and socio-cognitive, (2) socio-political and institutional, (3) economic, (4) organizational and professional, and (5) infrastructural. Our findings highlight critical barriers and facilitators while identifying research biases, including a predominant focus on zoonotic diseases and those with significant economic impact. The overrepresentation of studies from high-income countries underscores an imbalance in research efforts. Most studies emphasize individual-level determinants using epidemiological approaches, creating a notable gap in addressing systemic influences. Framing animal disease management within a socio-ecological model demonstrates the necessity of integrating these determinants into policy development. A systems-based approach proves essential for strengthening One Health governance. However, the current absence of cohesive and equitable global governance structures hampers strategy effectiveness. This calls for the implementation of intelligent governance mechanisms at local and global levels, coupled with appropriate tools and infrastructure to enhance disease management efficacy. The study provides a comprehensive framework for addressing multi-level determinants in animal health policy and practice.

Indexed as

ZoonosesAnimalsHumansPublic HealthSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID41860887
PMCPMC13004347

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.