Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41860883›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026

Human brucellosis in pregnancy in western Uganda: High seroprevalence and health risk factors identified in a cross-sectional study.

Wainaina Virginia, Marie Pascaline Sabine Ishimwe, Ahmed Kiswezi Kazigo, Tshimanga Tshilumba, Jean de Dieu Rukamba, Theophilus Pius, Sawda Abdikarim Sheikh Isse, Theoneste Hakizimana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Wainaina VirginiaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Uganda.
Marie Pascaline Sabine IshimweDepartment of Pediatrics and Child Health, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Uganda.
Ahmed Kiswezi KazigoDepartment of Surgery, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Uganda.
Tshimanga TshilumbaDepartment of Surgery, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Uganda.
Jean de Dieu RukambaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Uganda.
Theophilus PiusDepartment of Laboratory sciences, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Uganda.
Sawda Abdikarim Sheikh IsseDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Uganda.
Theoneste HakizimanaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kampala International University, Ishaka, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9282-5733

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman brucellosis is a neglected zoonosis that can cause anemia, miscarriage and pre-term birth, yet its burden during pregnancy in Uganda is unknown. This study determined the seroprevalence and associated risk factors for brucellosis among pregnant women at a Tertiary Hospital in Uganda. METHODOLOGY: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the antenatal clinic of Kampala International University Teaching Hospital, western Uganda (September-December 2024). Consecutive participants provided sociodemographic and livestock-exposure data and 5 mL of venous blood was drawn. Sera were screened with the Rose Bengal Plate Test; all reactive samples and 10% of non-reactive samples were confirmed with an indirect IgG/IgM ELISA. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors independently associated with seropositivity with significance set at P < 0.05.

resultsOf 207 enrolled women (median gestation = 24 weeks), 29 were ELISA-confirmed seropositive, giving a prevalence of 14.0% (95% CI 9.2-18.8). Independent risk factors were lack of formal education (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.05, 95% CI 1.02-16.01), consumption of fresh milk or under-cooked meat (aOR 5.70, 95% CI 1.94-16.76), frequent contact with animal manure (aOR 3.29, 95% CI 1.29-8.47) and rearing livestock at home (aOR 3.75, 95% CI 1.36-10.32).

conclusionsOne in seven pregnant women in this mixed livestock-human ecosystem showed evidence of brucellosis, far above the WHO elimination threshold. Integrating RBPT-based screening into routine antenatal care, promoting milk pasteurization and safe meat preparation, improving manure handling and strengthening herd vaccination through One-Health collaboration could reduce maternal infection and adverse pregnancy outcomes in similar smallholder settings.

Indexed as

BrucellosisPregnancy Complications, InfectiousAdolescentAdultAnimalsAntibodies, BacterialBrucellaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImmunoglobulin GPregnancyRisk FactorsSeroepidemiologic StudiesUgandaYoung AdultAntibodies, BacterialImmunoglobulin G

Identifiers

PMID41860883
PMCPMC13016472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.