ArticlePLOS mental health2026
Integrating homeless persons with mental health conditions back into low resource communities: A cross-sectional study.
Article in PLOS mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Homeless mentally ill persons remain a visible public health problem across Ghana. This study describes a reintegration intervention that identifies homeless persons with mental health conditions from the streets, provides comprehensive physical and mental healthcare, traces and reunites them to their families, links them to livelihoods and community mental-health services, and conducts routine follow-up calls. Data for this study were obtained from records review. Since the project began in 2016, 81 beneficiaries (53 females, 28 males) had been enrolled by 31 December 2024, with street exposure ranging from 11 days to 17 years; 28.4% had a history of psychoactive substance use, 66.7% had prior psychiatric care, and 91.4% were diagnosed with schizophrenia. At data compilation 29.6% remained on admission and 60.5% (49 people) had been repatriated, most after 1-3 months. Total expenditure for all 81 beneficiaries was GHS 2,835,365.30 (USD 190,933.69); spending on the 49 repatriated beneficiaries totalled GHS 1,635,620.00 (USD 110,143), averaging GHS 33,380 (USD 2,248) per person and ranging from GHS 14,019.60 to GHS 54,743.20. Among repatriated beneficiaries, 11.1% were engaged in economic activities, 55.6% assisted with household chores but were not employed, and 8.9% relapsed. With sustained stakeholder support and active collaboration, the intervention could serve as a scalable model for addressing homelessness among people with mental illness.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.