Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41860852›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Forecasting auditor's going concern opinion using with hybrid robust machine learning model.

Uğur Ejder, Alpaslan Yaşar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Uğur EjderAdana Alparslan Türkeş Science and Technology University, Department of Information Technology, Adana, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7796-9528
Alpaslan YaşarAdana Alparslan Türkeş Science and Technology University, Department of Business, Adana, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The importance of forecasting company bankruptcies makes the auditor's reporting of the going concern opinion (GCO) a focal point for interested parties. Therefore, researchers have recently turned to predicting GCO using various machine learning (ML) methods. The aim of this research is to propose a novel hybrid model that integrates ML models to enhance the prediction accuracy of the system. We use a combination of traditional (classical) and hybrid ML approaches to identify the superior model among 30 models based on empirical data of Turkish companies listed on Borsa Istanbul (BIST) for the period 2017-2021. Given that the distribution of classes in the analysed dataset is balanced, it can be confidently stated that the research is reliable. The ML models are selected in accordance with the non-linear system since the equation system under consideration is the non-linear system. To minimise deviations and errors caused by distribution and fragmentation, the k-fold method is used to separate the training and test data sets. The experimental results show that the Random Forest based AdaBoost hybrid model outperforms traditional and other hybrid ML models in terms of accuracy by 89%.

Indexed as

Machine LearningBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsForecastingHumansPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestSoft ComputingTurkey

Identifiers

PMID41860852
PMCPMC13004351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.