ArticlePLOS digital health2026
What should be included in a digital mental health intervention, based on solution-focused therapy, for young people who self-harm? A qualitative exploration of young people and clinicians' views.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) are an important resource for individuals who find it difficult to access in-person services, such as young people who self-harm. Most DMHIs currently are based on Cognitive-Behavioural Therapy. Solution-Focused Therapy (SFT) could provide different skills and learning but is not currently delivered digitally. Involving key stakeholders in the development of a novel DMHI is important for ensuring acceptability. The aims of this study are to explore stakeholder perceptions of a novel DMHI based in SFT, to determine what would promote or hinder engagement, and identify important content to include. We conducted focus groups and individual interviews with young people with lived experience of self-harm (n = 12) and clinicians experienced in SFT and working with young people who self-harm (n = 16). We captured a range of views through collective discussion in focus groups and more in-depth exploration in individual interviews. Data were analysed using content and framework methodologies. Content analysis enabled us to capture the direct likes, dislikes, and suggestions expressed, whereas framework analysis enabled capturing the overall perceptions of our proposed DMHI. Features identified as paramount to engagement were clear and straightforward content, personalisation to individual users, freely accessible, and assurances of confidentiality. Participants wanted content that challenged and provided novel ways of thinking. SFT was perceived as providing a different perspective to supporting mental health that participants viewed positively. Conversely, chatbots that cannot understand users and respond appropriately, or just refer people elsewhere, would discourage use. This study is the first to explore the application of SFT to a novel digital intervention, and the first to explore its acceptability with young people who self-harm. Key stakeholders felt positively about the proposed intervention, and provided specific recommendations to consider in the development of novel DMHIs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.