ArticlePloS one2026
A theoretical and experimental model of flow characteristics in subretinal injections.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subretinal injections (SI) are used to deliver gene therapies for inherited retinal diseases, yet the optimal injection parameters remain undefined. This study used theoretical and experimental models to quantify the relationship between injection pressure, flow dynamics, and residual flow. A theoretical model (TM) was developed based on the Hagen-Poiseuille law and the theory of a jet immersed in the same liquid. An experimental model (EM) was constructed to allow for measuring flow and residual flow across injection pressures ranging from 0 to 20 psi. We assessed the effects of ambient pressure, injection system tubing length, and syringe priming technique. A minimum pressure of 6 psi was required to generate a detectable flow in the EM. Jet speed increased with the square root of injection pressure, aligning with theoretical predictions. Residual flow persisted for 28-47 seconds after injection and increased logarithmically with injection pressure. Elevated ambient pressure (45 mmHg) only reduced flow at lower injection pressures. The "lock-and-load" priming method decreased jet speed and increased residual flow compared to the "load-and-lock" method. Both TM and EM quantified SI flow dynamics, with EM demonstrating residual flow at all tested pressures. To minimize complications, clinicians should use the lowest injection pressure and allow sufficient time for the cannula to be withdrawn from the subretinal space.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.