Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41860761›Full record

ArticleJournal of phycology2026

Adapting the growth-form concept to geniculate coralline algae (Corallinales, Rhodophyta).

Jakop Schwoerbel, Juliet Brodie, Martha S Calderon, Guillermo Diaz-Pulido, Paul W Gabrielson, Aki Kato, Line Le Gall, Gavin W Maneveldt, Clio Maridakis, Patrick T Martone and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of phycology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Jakop SchwoerbelAustralian National Algae Culture Collection, CSIRO, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9354-7608
Juliet BrodieNatural History Museum, Research, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7622-2564
Martha S CalderonInstituto de Investigación de Ingeniería Ambiental (INAM), Facultad de Ingeniería Ambiental, Biosistema y de la Energía (FIABE), Universidad Nacional Toribio Rodríguez de Mendoza de Amazonas (UNTRM), Chachapoyas, Amazonas, Peru.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3611-140X
Guillermo Diaz-PulidoSchool of Environment and Science, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0901-3727
Paul W GabrielsonBiology Department and Herbarium, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9416-1187
Aki KatoFisheries Laboratory, Blue Innovation Division, Seto Inland Sea Carbon-Neutral Research Center, Hiroshima University, Takehara, Hiroshima, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6124-9676
Line Le GallInstitut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7807-4569
Gavin W ManeveldtDepartment of Biodiversity and Conservation Biology, University of the Western Cape, Bellville, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5656-5348
Clio MaridakisInstitut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3153-1073
Patrick T MartoneDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6345-1023
Isabella MoroDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7850-6031
Robert J MrowickiNatural History Museum, Research, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7767-9259
Wendy A NelsonHerbarium, Natural Sciences Department, Tāmaki Paenga Hira Auckland Museum, Auckland Domain, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0014-5560
Viviana PeñaGrupo de Investigación BioCost, Facultade de Ciencias & CICA - Centro Interdisciplinary de Química e Bioloxía, Universidad da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7003-3850
Fabio RindiDipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell'Ambiente, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7392-3653
Florence RousseauInstitut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité (ISYEB), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, CNRS, Sorbonne Université, EPHE, Paris, France.
Tom SchilsMarine Laboratory, University of Guam, Mangilao, Guam.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1516-9082
Frederico T S TâmegaDepartamento de Biotecnologia Marinha, Instituto de Estudos do Mar Almirante Paulo Moreira, Arraial do Cabo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2773-2036
Riccardo TrentinDepartment of Biology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2886-3364

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24K09572Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle, ParisRoyal Society Te Apārangi
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Geniculate coralline algae (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) are a diverse group of calcifying macroalgae, loosely united by flexible upright axes formed by alternating calcified (intergenicula) and uncalcified segments (genicula), a trait that has independently arisen several times. To standardize terminology, the concept of growth forms (i.e., the external gross morphology of a specimen) was developed previously for non-geniculate (without joints) corallines, but no such efforts have been undertaken for geniculate corallines. Here, we adapted the growth--form concept to geniculate corallines. We propose that, based on their branching pattern and two- or three-dimensional branch arrangement, geniculate corallines can be grouped into seven growth forms: unbranched (unbranched uprights), feather-like (complanate, pinnate branching), fan-like (complanate, dichotomous branching), irregular (complanate or multiplanar without a clear branching pattern), whorled (multiplanar, verticillate branching), arbuscular (multiplanar, dichotomous branching), and plumose (multiplanar, pinnate branching). We have provided a dichotomous key to assign specimens to different growth forms and discussed examples of each of these growth forms as well as the concept of intergrades between them. Additionally, we have provided a glossary of terms used in the growthform definitions and for intergenicular morphology. These tools will be a helpful resource for ecologists, taxonomists, beachcombers, and anyone interested in these comparatively little-studied but diverse macroalgae.

Indexed as

Rhodophytaarticulated coralline algaebranching patterngrowth habitintergenicular morphology

Identifiers

PMID41860761
PMCPMC13103708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.