ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2026
Improving hospital substance use care from the ground up and from the outside in.
Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
settingThe Queen Elizabeth II (QEII) Health Sciences Centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia, is an academic, tertiary care hospital that lacked policies related to unregulated substance use, harm reduction, and addiction care. Substance use care was of poor quality and inconsistent, and the community-based standard-of-care was unavailable to hospitalized patients.
interventionA group of frontline hospital- and community-based healthcare providers, trainees, harm reduction workers, and people with lived experience organized to navigate this "policy vacuum". We invited community-based groups and resources into the hospital, developed informal policies and procedures to standardize care, and trained ourselves and others in substance use care best practices. OUTCOMES: We introduced several harm reduction initiatives from the community-including take-home naloxone kits, needle and syringe distribution, and oral and injectable opioid agonist treatment-without institutional policy support. We drafted our own informal harm reduction policies for the internal medicine inpatient unit, holding a focus group with people with lived experience for feedback and revision. This work contributed to funding for an addiction medicine consultation service and an institutional commitment to implement harm reduction-oriented substance use policies for healthcare settings across the province. IMPLICATIONS: Despite a lack of institutional policies or buy-in from senior leadership, harm reduction measures can be implemented in hospitals from the bottom-up and the outside-in-by healthcare providers organizing, leveraging existing community resources, and listening to people who use drugs. Clinicians at other hospitals could model our collaborative approach to improve care and push their health systems towards institutional change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.