Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41860746›Full record

ReviewJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2026

How is Racial Discrimination Assessed in Quantitative Health Research? A Systematic Review from a European Perspective.

Nora Hettich-Damm, Miriam Nicolai, Helena Dieterle, Carolin Siegert, Sören Kliem, Mita Banerjee, Elmar Braehler, Manfred E Beutel, Michael Dreier

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nora Hettich-DammDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany. Nora.hettich@unimedizin-mainz.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0422-7037
Miriam NicolaiDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-4885-1603
Helena DieterleDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-9878-6075
Carolin SiegertDepartment of Welfare, Ernst-Abbe-University of Applied Sciences Jena, Jena, Germany.
Sören KliemDepartment of Welfare, Ernst-Abbe-University of Applied Sciences Jena, Jena, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1788-9574
Mita BanerjeeDepartment of English and Linguistics, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7667-9844
Elmar BraehlerDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2648-2728
Manfred E BeutelDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1743-0042
Michael DreierDepartment of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3426-558X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Racial discrimination is a global issue that affects both physical and mental health. However, a comparative study looking at how racial discrimination is assessed in studies focusing on the effect of racial discrimination on overall health is lacking. This systematic review aimed to compare and describe the most commonly used racial discrimination assessment tools and the connection between racial discrimination and overall health. The review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-P guidelines and checklist. A total of 70 studies were identified as eligible for inclusion. The methodological quality of the reviewed studies was assessed using an adapted version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for cross-sectional studies and varied considerably across studies. Most studies were conducted in the USA with only five studies examining European samples. Within these European studies, ethnicity or race was not examined in relation to racial discrimination, but rather in the context of migration and minority status. Longitudinal designs, the use of standardized and validated instruments, and data from national or health-related surveys were rare. Nearly all studies reported positive associations between racial discrimination and adverse health outcomes. Overall, the review suggests that racial discrimination as a health risk has received little attention in European research and is predominantly discussed in the context of migration and integration. The findings further underscore the necessity of including quantitative assessments of racism, using validated questionnaires as an integral part of national and health-related surveys to better understand the significance of racial discrimination for health and obtain representative results that allow meaningful comparisons.

Indexed as

Health researchMental healthPhysical healthQuantitative measuresRacial discriminationSystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.