ArticleGeroScience2026
A parsimonious six-predictor model for memory decline: cross-population validation in Chinese and Japanese aging cohorts.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop and validate a parsimonious risk model for short-term memory decline in older adults and to evaluate its cross-population transportability between Chinese and Japanese cohorts. The model was developed in 5985 cognitively normal older adults from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS, 2011-2015). Seven machine learning algorithms were compared, and a Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH) model was selected for its optimal balance between performance and parsimony. The final model was validated in a temporal CHARLS cohort (2015-2018; n = 1333) and an external Japanese cohort from the Japanese Study of Aging and Retirement (JSTAR, 2007-2009; n = 2798). Performance was assessed using discrimination, calibration, decision curve analysis, and bootstrap-derived confidence intervals. In temporal validation, the model demonstrated good discrimination (C-index = 0.72) with acceptable calibration (slope = 1.40). In the external JSTAR cohort, discriminative performance remained moderate and stable (C-index = 0.68), and calibration was comparable (slope = 0.96) despite differences in baseline incidence and follow-up duration. Decision curve analysis showed net benefit in the temporal cohort and consistent risk stratification in the external cohort. Sensitivity analyses confirmed stable performance across varying follow-up horizons. The six-predictor model consistently stratified short-term memory decline risk across distinct East Asian populations. The findings support its cross-population transportability for relative risk stratification in aging cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41860732What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.