Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41860725›Full record

ArticleJournal of prevention (2022)2026

Digital Intervention Components for Preventing and Reducing Substance Use in Adolescents and Emerging Adults: A Comprehensive Scoping Review.

Doris Ochterbeck, Saskia Muellmann, Ansgar Gerhardus, Robert Hrynyschyn, Hannah Graff, Heide Busse, Stefanie Maria Helmer

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of prevention (2022), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Doris OchterbeckWorking Group Evidence-Based Public Health, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2153-2527
Saskia MuellmannDepartment of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8650-8395
Ansgar GerhardusLeibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-7419
Robert HrynyschynLeibniz ScienceCampus Digital Public Health, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8642-9590
Hannah GraffDepartment of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5931-0324
Heide BusseDepartment of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology - BIPS, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6043-9072
Stefanie Maria HelmerWorking Group Evidence-Based Public Health, Institute of Public Health and Nursing Research, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany. sthelmer@uni-bremen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4435-4041

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Substance use is a well-known public health problem among adolescents and emerging adults. Digital prevention components, oftentimes included in interventions to target substance use, offer unique possibilities and might be particularly suited for these age groups. However, thus far, a comprehensive overview of substance use prevention interventions utilising digital components is lacking. Hence, the overall aim of this study is to fill this research gap by identifying the type of digital components, their theoretical approaches and their combinations employed in substance use interventions for adolescents and emerging adults, and how the evidence base for their (individual) effectiveness was assessed. The literature was searched in four databases: MEDLINE, PsychInfo, CINAHL and Web of Science in May 2023. Inclusion criteria based on the PCC concept were: Population (adolescents and emerging adults aged 12-21 years), Concept ((a) digital components of interventions AND (b) prevention or reduction AND (c) substance use), Context (all contexts). Studies were selected after title/abstract screening by two independent researchers. Data extraction included: substances and substance use behaviour, underlying theory/approach, characteristics of digital intervention components, methods used for evidence assessment, and study characteristics. These data were narratively summarised. 4,905 publications were screened and 176 were included, of which 114 reported on interventions with emerging adults and 62 with adolescents. These interventions were predominantly delivered in educational settings (86%), namely universities/(vocational)schools. Alcohol was the most commonly investigated single target substance (74%). The majority of all interventions were based on more than one theory/approach and it was not always clear which theories were combined. The most commonly reported approach in interventions for adolescents was the provision of information/education, for emerging adults, interventions were based on Social Norms Theory most frequently. The majority of interventions were delivered web-based. Randomized controlled study designs dominated, and evaluation was rarely performed separately for the intervention components. A variety of digital intervention components exist to reduce or prevent substance use among adolescents and emerging adults. However, different intervention components based on diverse theoretical approaches are often combined in one intervention and the individual effects of single components remain largely unmeasured. Future studies should consider innovative methods to analyse the effectiveness of individual components, and their possible interactions, within complex interventions. Combining effective digital components or adding these components to non-digital interventions could optimize the effectiveness of interventions for young people.

Indexed as

Substance-Related DisordersAdolescentDigital HealthDigital MediaHumansYoung AdultAdolescentsDigitalEvaluationPreventionSubstance useYouth

Identifiers

PMID41860725
PMCPMC13283198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.