ArticleJournal of epidemiology and global health2026
Determining the Protective Role of Grip Strength in Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease Risk Among Middle-Aged and Older Women in South Korea.
Article in Journal of epidemiology and global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHandgrip strength is a simple measure of muscle function and health outcomes in older adults. Here, we investigated whether higher handgrip strength is associated with a lower risk of cardiovascular (CVD) and cerebrovascular (CeVD) diseases in middle-aged and older adults by focusing on its potential protective role in women.
methodsWe analyzed data for approximately 9,500 participants of the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging (aged ≥ 45 years, no CVD/CeVD at baseline). Handgrip strength was measured in multiple waves and treated as time-varying exposure. Cross-sectional logistic regression was used to evaluate baseline associations, while Cox regression models with time-varying handgrip strength were used to assess the 16-year incidences of CVD and CeVD after adjusting for major confounders. The analyses were stratified according to sex.
resultsA higher handgrip strength was inversely associated with baseline CVD and CeVD prevalence (odds ratio, ~ 0.94–0.96 per 1-kg increase; p < 0.001). Over a 16-year follow-up, each 1-kg increase in handgrip strength predicted a lower hazard of CeVD (hazard ratio [HR], ~ 0.98) that was driven by a significant protective effect in women (HR, ~ 0.95) versus no association in men. Similarly, a higher handgrip strength predicted a lower CVD risk in women (HR, ~ 0.97) but not men.
conclusionGreater handgrip strength was associated with lower risks of CVD and CeVD later in life. Although the associations appeared stronger in women, these differences should be interpreted cautiously given potential scaling effects. Handgrip strength may be a simple and clinically practical functional marker for vascular risk stratification in middle-aged and older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.