ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
MRI-based AI framework for predicting lymph node metastasis and prognosis in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a multicenter study.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEarly prediction of lymph node metastasis (LNM) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is crucial for improving treatment planning and prognosis in rectal cancer (RC) patients. This study aims to develop an MRI-based AI framework integrating clinical, radiomics, and autoencoder features to predict LNM and prognosis post-nCRT.
methodsThis study included 577 RC patients who underwent nCRT followed by surgical resection, with data collected from three centers. The dataset was divided into training set, internal validation set and external test set to develop a fully automated AI framework. The framework consists of a 3D U-Net lesion segmentation model, a feature extraction scheme integrating clinical, radiomics and autoencoder features, and an LNM classification model using machine learning. SHAP values elucidated the contributions of individual features and Cox regression analyses identified key prognostic features. Additionally, we compared the diagnostic capabilities of the proposed model with three radiologists in identifying LNM.
resultsThe lesion segmentation model achieved a DICE coefficient of 0.81 on the external test set. The LNM classification models (Random Forest, LightGBM, CatBoost, XGBoost) showed AUROC values of 0.71, 0.71, 0.75, and 0.77 on the internal validation set, and 0.62, 0.67, 0.65, and 0.73 on the external test set, with XGBoost performing best. The model outperformed radiologists in accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity for LNM diagnosis. Higher values of T2WI_feat_16 and DWI_feat_164 were linked to poor prognosis.
conclusionsThis AI framework provides a tool for predicting LNM and prognosis in RC patients after nCRT, enhancing clinical decision-making and prognostic assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41860709What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.