ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Site-specific limitations of ctDNA in PDAC surveillance: imaging detects pulmonary and local recurrence missed by liquid biopsy.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the concordance between circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and imaging in the postoperative surveillance of patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).
methodsThis single-center, retrospective study included 50 patients with resected PDAC who underwent both ctDNA testing and surveillance imaging between January 2015 and February 2025. Imaging included CT or CT/MRI of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis at 3-6 month intervals, with ctDNA testing performed on a similar schedule. Two abdominal radiologists independently reviewed all imaging for recurrence, defined by new or enlarging lesions; discrepancies were resolved by consensus. ctDNA recurrence was defined as the detection of tumor-specific mutations. Concordance was assessed at the patient level.
resultsAmong 50 patients (median age 69.5 years, 33 men, 17 women), ctDNA and imaging were concordant in 39 (78%): 22 had recurrence and 17 did not. Discordance occurred in 11 patients, 10 of whom had radiologic recurrence with negative ctDNA. Most discordant lesions were located in the lung (n = 5, median size 0.4 cm) or surgical bed (n = 5, median size 2.0 cm). Radiologic recurrences preceded negative ctDNA test results in all 10 of these cases. One patient had positive ctDNA without imaging recurrence over 497 days of follow-up. At the organ level, 1/6 (17%) of lung metastases and 10/15 (67%) of local recurrences by imaging were detected by ctDNA. All lymph node, liver, peritoneal, and bone metastases were detected by ctDNA.
conclusionPositive ctDNA tests after PDAC resection correlates with radiologic recurrences in the lymph nodes, liver, peritoneum, and bones. However, radiologic recurrences in the lungs or surgical bed are commonly associated with a negative ctDNA test. Radiologists should scrutinize the latter two sites even when ctDNA tests are negative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41860708What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.