ReviewMolecular biology reports2026
The critical role of oxidative stress in male infertility: causes, diagnostic biomarkers, and the efficacy of antioxidant therapy.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Male infertility is a significant global health concern, impacting approximately 15% of couples attempting to conceive, with male-related factors accounting for nearly 50% of these cases. A key underlying mechanism increasingly recognized by researchers is oxidative stress—the disruption between reactive oxygen species (ROS) and the body’s ability to neutralize them with antioxidants. While low levels of ROS are necessary for normal sperm functions such as maturation and fertilization, excessive ROS accumulation—driven by conditions like varicoceles, infections, or exposure to tobacco, alcohol, radiation, and environmental toxins—can lead to significant sperm damage. This includes fragmented DNA, reduced motility, and impaired mitochondrial function, all of which hinder fertility potential. This comprehensive analysis, drawing on research published between 2000 and 2025, identifies key oxidative stress biomarkers, including malondialdehyde (MDA), 8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), and total antioxidant capacity (TAC), as valuable tools for assessing sperm health and diagnosing oxidative imbalance. These indicators offer essential insights into the biological mechanisms behind male infertility and hold significant promise for clinical application. Various antioxidant supplements—such as vitamins C and E, selenium, zinc, carnitine, coenzyme Q10, lycopene, and folic acid—have shown potential in improving semen parameters by counteracting oxidative damage. However, clinical outcomes remain inconsistent, largely due to variability in dosing strategies, treatment length, and individual patient responsiveness. Additionally, the absence of standardized testing methods for measuring oxidative stress in clinical settings hinders early diagnosis and the development of customized treatment plans. To advance the field, there is an urgent need to establish clearer biomarker reference ranges, implement consistent diagnostic criteria, and develop antioxidant treatment protocols grounded in robust clinical evidence. Integrating these advancements into routine medical practice could transform the approach to male infertility, enabling earlier identification of at-risk men and more personalized therapeutic interventions. By aligning scientific discoveries with real-world healthcare delivery, clinicians may offer renewed hope to couples facing fertility struggles. Ongoing, rigorous research remains essential to convert current knowledge into practical, effective treatments that improve reproductive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41860692What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.