ArticleJournal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine2026
Environmental Risk and Adverse Perinatal Health Indicators in New York City: A Geospatial Hotspot Analysis.
Article in Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Environmental exposures can have adverse associations with perinatal health and birth outcomes. This study aimed to identify the overlap and association between urban areas of environmental risk and adverse perinatal health indicator hotspots in New York City. We examined 2101 census tracts representing 575,257 births from 2016 to 2020 recorded by the New York City Bureau of Vital Statistics looking at preterm birth, adolescent pregnancy, and pre-pregnancy obesity rates. The Getis-Ord Gi* statistic was used to identify geospatial hotspots of adverse indicators. We used multivariable logistic regression to assess associations between areas of environmental risk and odds of indicator hotspot status and Poisson regression to assess associations of hotspot overlap. Overall, 54.6% of environmental risk areas were hotspots for at least one adverse perinatal indicator, accounting for 63.7% of preterm birth hotspots, 93.7% of adolescent pregnancy hotspots, and 67.3% of pre-pregnancy obesity hotspots. Compared with non-risk areas, risk areas had greater odds of being a hotspot of preterm birth (aOR = 2.11; 95% CI 1.60-2.78), adolescent pregnancy (aOR = 32.8; 21.8-49.4), and pre-pregnancy obesity (aOR = 3.15; 2.56-3.87). Environmental risk areas were expected to have 3.36 times the number of overlapping hotspots after adjusting for parental birthplace and parity. The overlap between environmental risk areas and hotspots of adverse perinatal health indicators and the associations with individual indicators and overlapping hotspots suggest that environmental risk area designation may be a useful measure of perinatal health vulnerability for targeted community interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.