Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41860643›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026

[

Jiahui Liu, Qingqing Han, Wenbo Wu, Hai Wang, Xiaona Li, Kun Zheng, Dachun Zhao, Wenbin Ma, Xin Cheng, Xiaopeng Guo and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jiahui Liu *Department of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Qingqing Han *Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Wenbo WuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Hai WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xiaona LiDepartment of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Kun ZhengDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Dachun ZhaoDepartment of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Wenbin MaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xin ChengDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Xiaopeng GuoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. guoxiaopeng@pumch.cn.
Li HuoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. Huoli@pumch.cn.
Yu WangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. ywang@pumch.cn.

Funding

National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2025-PUMCH-A-156Non-profit Central Research Institute Fund of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences AY202410254the CAMS Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences (CIFMS) 2024-I2M-C&T-B-021Xiaopeng Guo, Peking Union Medical College Hospital Talent Cultivation Program (Category D) UHB12428
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAmong oligodendrogliomas, World Health Organization (WHO) grade 2 tumors have relatively more favorable prognosis compared to the grade 3. However, heterogeneity in tumoral behavior exists in grade 2 oligodendrogliomas, with some exhibiting an aggressive course. The authors applied [18F]FET-PET in oligodendrogliomas and extended its utility in predicting prognosis of low-grade oligodendrogliomas.

methodsTwelve consecutive patients with oligodendrogliomas treated at our institution (Oligo-WHO2: n = 8; Oligo-WHO3: n = 4) were enrolled. All patients underwent contrast-enhanced MRI and [18F]FET-PET/MR before surgery. Maximum and mean target-to-background ratios (TBRmax, TBRmean) were evaluated, and progression-free survival (PFS) was recorded. Bulk RNA sequencing and immunohistochemical(IHC) staining were performed for the verification of [18F]FET-PET findings.

resultsAll grade-3 oligodendrogliomas presented high [18F]FET uptake on PET and contrast-enhancement on MRI. Although all grade-2 tumors were non-enhanced, only 50% showed low uptake of [18F]FET, which thus dissected grade-2 oligodendrogliomas into two subgroups: Oligo-WHO2-Low-Uptake and Oligo-WHO2-High-Uptake tumors. Using cutoff of TBRmax = 2.5, [18F]FET-PET based stratification was more correlated with PFS, compared to the WHO grade classification, with all of 4 recurrent oligodendrogliomas (2/4 were grade-2) being [18F]FET high-uptake. Transcriptional results revealed clear discrimination: Oligo-WHO2-High-Uptake tumors were enriched with pathways of energy metabolism and tumor chemotaxis, while the Oligo-WHO2-High-Uptake group displayed upregulation of myelin formation-related pathways. Representative protein markers were selected for validation, with IHC staining unveiling AK4, CXCL5, and IL-33 highly expressed in Oligo-WHO2-High-Uptake oligodendrogliomas and SOX10 enriched in Oligo-WHO2-Low-Uptake tumors.

conclusionWHO grade 2 oligodendrogliomas is a heterogeneous composition of tumors with distinct prognosis and molecular characteristics. [18F]FET-PET represents a promising radiological tool for dissecting these tumors.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsOligodendrogliomaPositron-Emission TomographyTyrosineAdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticals(18F)fluoroethyltyrosineRadiopharmaceuticalsTyrosine[18F]FET-PETLow-grade gliomaOligodendrogliomaPrognosisProgression-free survival

Identifiers

PMID41860643
PMCPMC13004747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.