Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41860606›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine2026

A scoping review of risk determinants for workplace violence in emergency departments.

Lei Li, Lanxin Ouyang, Yin Lin, Lei Wang, Mengmeng Wu, Di Liu

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lei LiDepartment of Emergency, The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430014, China.
Lanxin Ouyang
Yin Lin
Lei Wang
Mengmeng Wu
Di Liu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workplace violence refers to physical violence, verbal abuse, threats, or other aggressive behaviors directed toward healthcare workers in the workplace. It is a critical occupational and public health hazard, disproportionately affecting emergency departments (EDs) worldwide. This scoping review aimed to synthesize evidence on the prevalence of ED violence and to map its risk determinants through the lens of 'Who, When, and Why'. We conducted a scoping review following PRISMA guidelines, including qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-method studies on risk determinants for ED violence. PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science were searched from inception to June 2025. English-language studies reporting prevalence or risk factors of ED violence were included. Titles and abstracts were screened using ASReview. Twenty-one studies were included, reporting workplace violence prevalence ranging from 72.5% to 91.5%. Thirty-four influencing factors were identified across four dimensions: individual characteristics (perpetrator traits: male gender, middle age, psychiatric illness, substance use; healthcare worker traits: provider gender), temporal triggers (night shifts, weekends, long waiting times), spatial vulnerabilities (triage and treatment areas, overcrowded or poorly monitored spaces), and situational/psychological drivers (pain, fear, unmet expectations, miscommunication). Workplace violence in EDs is a multifactorial phenomenon shaped by individual vulnerabilities, environmental pressures, and systemic factors. This review highlights the persistent normalization of violence against frontline staff and underscores the need for immediate protective measures and systemic reforms.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalHealth PersonnelWorkplace ViolenceHumansPrevalenceRisk FactorsWorking Conditionsemergency departmentrisk factorsscoping reviewworkplace violence

Identifiers

PMID41860606
PMCPMC13124255

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.