Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41860586›Full record

SynthesisJournal of nursing management2026

Exploring the Concept of Nurses' Healthcare Policy Competence: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Meta-Synthesis.

Nam Kyung Han, Jong Gun Kim

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of nursing management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nam Kyung HanDepartment of Nursing, Gyeongbuk College of Health, Daehakro 168, Gimcheon, 39525, Gyeongbuk, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4858-0916
Jong Gun KimDepartment of Nursing Science, Hoseo University, 79 Hoseo-ro 20beon-gil Baebang-eup, Asan-si, 31499, Chungnam, South Korea, hoseo.ac.kr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3695-9726

Funding

Hoseo University 2025-0162-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurses' competence in healthcare policy is crucial for policy intervention to strengthen public health equity and resolve health problems through healthcare policy reforms. Previous studies conducted systematic reviews, scoping reviews, or meta-syntheses related to the political competence of nurses, factors affecting nurses' policy interventions, and barriers and facilitators of policy intervention, but the concept of healthcare policy competence was not examined.

aimThis study explored nurses' competence in healthcare policy through a systematic review and meta-synthesis of previous qualitative studies.

methodsA systematic review of English-language journal articles in databases including Medline, Embase, PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus published up to December 31, 2023, generated 17,810 identified articles, of which 27 individual studies were used for analysis. Researchers with rich experiences in healthcare policy interventions and qualitative research analysis extracted data using ATLAS.ti and meta-synthesized it.

resultsNurses' competence in healthcare policy was synthesized into five factors: intrinsic motivation, healthcare expertise, policy development, political skills, and policy intervention. Fifteen themes and 34 subthemes were derived as subattributes.

conclusionsThis study provides a conceptual framework for nurses' competence in healthcare policy and for developing political or policy education or programs to strengthen this competence.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceHealth PolicyNursesHumansQualitative Researchcompetencehealthcaremeta-synthesisnursespolicyqualitative

Identifiers

PMID41860586
PMCPMC13140810

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.