ArticleJACC. Case reports2026
Invasive Confirmation of Microvascular Recovery Parallel to Left Ventricular Functional Restoration.
Article in JACC. Case reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is increasingly implicated in heart failure, but reversal with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is rarely documented using invasive physiology. CASE SUMMARY: A 53-year-old man presented with paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea. Electrocardiography showed precordial ST-T changes; brain natriuretic peptide was 419 pg/mL; left ventricular ejection fraction 35% with anteroseptal hypokinesis. Coronary angiography revealed intermediate proximal left anterior descending artery disease with nonischemic fractional flow reserve (0.84). Invasive indices indicated CMD (mean transit time [Tmn] 2.41/0.70 s; coronary flow reserve [CFR] 3.4; index of microvascular resistance [IMR] 59). After GDMT, left ventricular ejection fraction normalized (63%), and brain natriuretic peptide fell to 4.0 pg/mL at 3 months. Repeat physiology showed restored microvascular function (Tmn 0.84/0.20 s; CFR 4.2; IMR 15); fractional flow reserve remained nonischemic (0.82). DISCUSSION: Marked improvement in IMR/CFR supports CMD-rather than epicardial stenosis-as the principal driver of the initial ischemic phenotype. GDMT may enhance microvascular vasodilator tone and myocardial energetics, improving CMD. TAKE-HOME MESSAGE: Contemporary GDMT may favorably modulate the coronary microcirculation; improvement in CMD may parallel clinical recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.