ArticleGlobal change biology2026
Global Patterns of Niche Changes in Alien Mammals: Potential Drivers and Significance for Invasion Projections.
Article in Global change biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Global Patterns of Niche Changes in Alien Mammals: Potential Drivers and Significance for Invasion Projections.Global change biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Biological invasions are a major driver of global change, and prevention is the most effective mitigation strategy. Bioclimatic species distribution models (SDMs) are widely used to estimate invasion risk, assuming that species retain their realized native climatic niches after introduction. We tested this assumption for 194 alien mammal species established across 11 zoogeographic realms, examining realized niche changes, their drivers, and significance for invasion projections. We used a robust ordination framework to compare native and alien niches in 337 species-by-realm niche comparisons and quantify niche expansion, the proportion of the alien niche not overlapping with the native niche, and niche unfilling, the proportion of the native niche not overlapping with the alien niche. We then applied Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs) with multi-model inference to test how species attributes, invasion history, and environmental context are associated with expansion and unfilling. Additionally, we evaluated the transferability of SDMs built on native presences to receiving regions using multiple metrics and used GLMMs to assess how niche changes may affect it. Niche expansion was rare and modest, whereas niche unfilling was common and pronounced. Niche expansion declined with increasing human disturbance, larger native range size, and introductions within similar communities, but increased with higher introduction effort. Niche unfilling decreased with greater introduction effort and longer residence time, but increased with alien insularity, human disturbance, and native range loss. SDM transferability was generally good, but it declined with niche expansion, as alien presences fell outside native-like suitable areas, and with unfilling, because suitable areas remained unoccupied under colonization lags. Proactive management can rely on SDMs to anticipate future spread and should prioritize species showing high niche unfilling, indicating substantial spread potential, and any evidence of niche expansion, which makes spread harder to anticipate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.