ReviewNephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association2026
Indexing for body surface area when assessing kidney function.
Review in Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) indexed to a standardized body surface area (BSA) of 1.73 m² is the cornerstone metric for kidney function assessment, allowing comparisons across individuals with diverse body sizes. This review outlines the historical development of BSA estimation methods and the rationale behind indexing GFR. While BSA-indexed GFR is useful for population-level comparisons and chronic kidney disease staging, non-indexed GFR reflects renal clearance and should be preferred for specific purposes, such as drug dosing. In addition, it is discussed whether to use indexed or non-indexed GFR when deciding to accept a kidney for transplantation for a patient with kidney failure, or when assessing GFR over time in individuals with severe weight change. Alternative indexing methods based on lean body mass, total body water, or extracellular fluid volume show theoretical potential but lack established clinical benefit. Future research may explore novel indexing methods that balance physiological accuracy and clinical practicality. For now, BSA-indexed GFR remains the clinical standard to assess and monitor kidney function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.