ArticleJournal of vision2026
Correction of saccadic decisions during active visual search in the monkey.
Article in Journal of vision, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prior research has shown that during tasks with very salient saccadic targets, like popout visual-search and double-step saccade tasks in both humans and monkeys, two-saccade sequences occur, where an initial saccade to a distractor is followed soon after by an ultra-short-latency (USL) second saccade to the popout target. This indicates that the USL second saccade uses visual information obtained before the first saccade and corrects the erroneous decision to make the first saccade to the distractor. Here, we demonstrate that such USL second saccades also often occur when monkeys perform active visual search without a popout visual target. Unlike in prior studies where the search target was extremely salient and therefore all second saccades showed a high accuracy toward the target, in our task, we show that USL saccades are preferentially directed towards the search-target and the transfer of target selection and location information across the first saccade is very accurate. USL saccades foveate the target more often than regular-latency saccades especially when the saccade starts far away from the target. We demonstrate various properties of USL saccades that reveal how the error-correction process is very accurate and how concurrent processing of saccade goals may proceed on the basis of computations in visual/oculomotor priority maps. Our results expand our understanding of saccadic targeting and information transfer across saccades during goal-directed active vision, lay the ground for future neurophysiological studies, and suggest that error-processing in different sensory and response modalities show similar patterns and may be accounted for by similar models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.