ArticleMicrobiology spectrum2026
Evaluation of an automated blood culture detection system for sterility testing of cellular and gene therapy products.
Article in Microbiology spectrum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sterility testing of cellular and gene therapy products is required to ensure safe infusion for the recipient. Sterility testing is often performed using broth-based media per the biopharmaceutical compendial USP <71> method. Automated blood culture systems have emerged as a potential alternative method, but data remain limited. It also remains unclear whether different cellular and gene therapy product formulations inhibit microbial growth during sterility testing, which could lead to false-negative sterility results. This study evaluated the ability to perform sterility testing using the BacT/Alert Virtuo automated blood culture system, BacT/Alert FA plus (aerobic) and FN plus (anaerobic) blood culture bottles, and two product formulations: (i) Plasmalyte-A + 2.5% human serum albumin (HSA) and (ii) Plasmalyte-A + 5% HSA + 5% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Contrived specimens were created using either formulation or a saline-only growth control inoculated with IMPORTANCE: Cellular and gene therapy products have emerged in recent years as an important treatment modality at large academic medical centers; however, these products must be tested for microbial contamination to ensure product safety. Compared to the gold standard, agar-based solid media method, automated blood culture systems have emerged as a potential alternative method of sterility testing. Here, we evaluated the ability of an automated blood culture detection system (BacT/Alert Virtuo) to reliably detect diverse microorganisms, ranging from bacteria to mold, in two standard cellular and gene therapy product formulations. Our results support current evidence that the use of automated blood culture detection systems is a reliable alternative method of sterility testing for different formulations of cellular and gene therapy products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.