Observational studyJournal of internal medicine2026
Poor long-term cardiovascular risk factor management after acute coronary syndrome: An observational cohort study.
Observational study in Journal of internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCardiovascular risk factor control reduces the risk of recurrent events after acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Long-term post-ACS management is poorly studied.
objectivesTo assess frequency of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and systolic blood pressure (SBP) monitoring and target achievement during 3 years post-ACS.
methodsData from all patients hospitalized for ACS in Uppsala between 2012 and 2020 were obtained from electronic health records (EHRs). The probability of measurement and target achievement was estimated with adjusted regression models. Associations were assessed for sex, participation in cardiac rehabilitation (CR), presence of diabetes with nurse-led follow-up and documentation of an ICD-10 code for chronic ischaemic heart disease in the EHR.
resultsAmong 6083 patients (median age 73 years, 34% female), follow-up data were available for 72% in year 1, 56% in year 2 and 44% in year 3. Year 3 LDL-C was not measured in 48% of patients, and 19% were at target (<1.8 mmol/L). For SBP, 16% lacked a measurement, and 50% were at target (<140 mmHg). Female sex was associated with lower probability of having LDL-C measured or having LDL-C or SBP at target. CR participation, structured diabetes follow-up or having a chronic ischaemic heart disease code in the EHR was associated with a higher probability of LDL-C and SBP measurements at 2 and 3 years.
conclusionsLack of measurement and low risk factor achievement highlight missed opportunities in secondary prevention. Female sex, lack of structured follow-up and the absence of diagnostic labelling were associated with less frequent monitoring and poorer risk factor control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.