ArticleCell transplantation
Research landscapes and knowledge structure of cardiac xenotransplantation: A bibliometric analysis.
Article in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac xenotransplantation is advancing rapidly from basic research to early clinical use, but its research landscape has not been comprehensively mapped. We conducted a bibliometric and science-mapping analysis of English-language articles and reviews in the Web of Science Core Collection (1964-2025). Using VOSviewer, CiteSpace, and Bibliometrix, we assessed publication growth, collaboration networks, citation impact, and topic trends. The field has grown steadily and has accelerated in recent years in parallel with key clinical developments. Collaboration is strongest among institutions in the United States, Europe, and East Asia, and a small number of authors and centers contribute a large share of publications. Most studies are published in specialty transplantation journals, whereas major breakthroughs often appear in general medical journals. Research topics continue to focus on rejection and complement biology, while newer work highlights gene-edited donors, biosafety, clinical trial readiness, and pig-to-human models. Overall, the field appears to be maturing toward clinical implementation, and these findings can help guide research priorities, funding decisions, and policy planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.