ReviewCurrent opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery2026
Rehabilitation treatment specification system: latest tools, trials, and pathways to advance the science underlying voice therapy.
Review in Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review summarizes the latest advances in applying the rehabilitation treatment specification system (RTSS) to voice therapy. RECENT
findingsRecent RTSS work has moved beyond conceptual endorsement to practical demonstrations in vocal rehabilitation. Multiple studies now provide complete RTSS specifications of voice therapy protocols and everyday clinical care, supporting content validity and enabling direct comparison of treatment components across approaches and sites. RTSS-guided intervention development has produced componentized protocols that translate treatment theories into explicit ingredient-target hypotheses suitable for refinement through empirical testing. RTSS-based mapping has also clarified overlap and meaningful differences across evidence-based therapies. Finally, RTSS-informed evidence synthesis has reduced heterogeneity in meta-analytic work by regrouping studies according to mechanism-relevant component categories (organ functions vs. skills & habits), yielding more interpretable patterns of treatment effects. SUMMARY: The RTSS is emerging as a practical infrastructure for cumulative, component-based voice therapy science, supporting clearer intervention reporting, mechanistic interpretation, cross-disciplinary transfer, and scalable adoption in routine documentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.