Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859934›Full record

ArticleJournal of patient safety2026

The Safety Action Feedback and Engagement (SAFE) Loop: Initial Testing and Refinement of a Novel Intervention to Enhance Hospital Incident Reporting and Patient Safety.

Edward Seferian, Carl T Berdahl, Bernice Coleman, Donna Leang, Tara Cohen, Nabeel Qureshi, Sara G McCleskey, Karen Kaiser, Matthew Grissinger, Falisha Kanji and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Edward SeferianCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Carl T BerdahlCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Bernice ColemanCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Donna LeangCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Tara CohenCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Nabeel QureshiCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Sara G McCleskeyCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Karen KaiserDepartment of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Matthew GrissingerInstitute for Safe Medication Practices, ECRI, Plymouth Meeting, PA.
Falisha KanjiCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Andrew J HenreidCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Johan Carrascoza-BolanosCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Laura DanielsCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Oscar AbarcaCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Pamela De La CruzCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Brandon T TruongCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.
Teryl K NuckolsCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.ORCID 0000-0002-0416-1595
SAFE Loop Authorship Group

Funding

AHRQ HHS R01 HS027455
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesVoluntary incident reporting has improved safety in many high-risk industries, but barriers limit its effectiveness in hospitals. To overcome these, we designed the Safety Action Feedback and Engagement (SAFE) Loop to obtain input from nurses about and prioritize patient safety problems, teach nurses to write more informative reports and report priority incidents, standardize investigations, and provide feedback to nurses about mitigation plans. The present work sought to iteratively test and refine the nascent intervention.

methodsSet at a large US academic hospital, this work had 3 phases: (A) proof-of-concept testing on 2 nursing units, exploring potential feasibility and acceptability; (B) iterative refinements to intervention design and implementation plans; and (C) structured pilot testing on one nursing unit to produce descriptive and qualitative data related to the feasibility and acceptability of the refined intervention, and feasibility of future outcome measures.

resultsProof-of-concept testing demonstrated the feasibility of intervention elements and nurses' enthusiasm. Incorporating iterative refinements, the structured pilot testing reaffirmed the feasibility of implementing the full SAFE Loop intervention and of collecting outcome data. Qualitative interviews after the pilot reaffirmed intervention acceptability.

conclusionsThe SAFE Loop shows promise as an approach to enhancing hospital incident reporting systems. The present work illustrates how patient safety leaders can build from an initial intervention design toward a refined design and implementation plan, with demonstrated acceptability to stakeholders and feasible implementation.

Indexed as

FeedbackPatient SafetyRisk ManagementSafety ManagementHumansNursing Staff, HospitalPilot Projectshospitalshuman factors engineeringincident reportingnurses or nursingpatient safety

Identifiers

PMID41859934
PMCPMC13193721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.