ReviewEuropean journal of public health2026
Greening healthcare through circular economy: advancing health and sustainability in policy and practice.
Review in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Towards sustainable healthcare in otorhinolaryngology: assessing knowledge, engagement, and opportunities for change.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Through its activities and energy consumption, the healthcare sector contributes to environmental degradation and climate change. With rising healthcare demands, the adoption of sustainable models has become increasingly urgent. Circular economy (CE) principles-Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, and Recover-offer a strategic framework to minimize waste and resource use while enhancing system resilience. A narrative review was conducted using Medline (PubMed) and Web of Science, covering literature from January 2015 to June 2025. Studies were selected based on relevance to CE principles in healthcare, including case studies, reviews, and original research. The review identified diverse interventions aligned with CE principles, including reducing low-value care and energy consumption, optimizing surgical trays, promoting reusable medical devices, enhancing waste segregation, and recovering energy from non-recyclable waste. Case studies from various countries highlight both environmental and economic benefits, such as lower CO2 emissions, cost savings, and greater operational efficiency. However, challenges remain, including limited climate literacy, regulatory gaps, and insufficient leadership. Applying CE principles in healthcare can significantly reduce environmental impact while supporting high-value care and financial sustainability. Broader adoption requires systemic policy support, stakeholder engagement, and integration of environmental metrics into clinical and procurement decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.