Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859919›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of public health2026

Greening healthcare through circular economy: advancing health and sustainability in policy and practice.

Zeynep Or

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zeynep OrInstitut de Recherche et Documentation en économie de la Santé (IRDES) , 21-23 rue des Ardennes, Paris, 75019, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6860-3735

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Through its activities and energy consumption, the healthcare sector contributes to environmental degradation and climate change. With rising healthcare demands, the adoption of sustainable models has become increasingly urgent. Circular economy (CE) principles-Reduce, Reuse, Recycle, and Recover-offer a strategic framework to minimize waste and resource use while enhancing system resilience. A narrative review was conducted using Medline (PubMed) and Web of Science, covering literature from January 2015 to June 2025. Studies were selected based on relevance to CE principles in healthcare, including case studies, reviews, and original research. The review identified diverse interventions aligned with CE principles, including reducing low-value care and energy consumption, optimizing surgical trays, promoting reusable medical devices, enhancing waste segregation, and recovering energy from non-recyclable waste. Case studies from various countries highlight both environmental and economic benefits, such as lower CO2 emissions, cost savings, and greater operational efficiency. However, challenges remain, including limited climate literacy, regulatory gaps, and insufficient leadership. Applying CE principles in healthcare can significantly reduce environmental impact while supporting high-value care and financial sustainability. Broader adoption requires systemic policy support, stakeholder engagement, and integration of environmental metrics into clinical and procurement decisions.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health CareHealth PolicySustainable DevelopmentClimate ChangeHumans

Identifiers

PMID41859919
PMCPMC13017763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.