ArticleEuropean journal of public health2026
The politics of health: exploring the potential and the limits of health in all policies under multilevel governance.
Article in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Health in All Policies (HiAP) approach has been the main focus for intersectoral action for health and heath equity but has proved challenging as result of other political and economic priorities of governments and the multilevel nature of policymaking. This article explores the role of HiAP in changing politics and policy context. The article takes a critical appraisal on how HiAP has been conceptualized and used to compare concepts associated with HiAP. It assesses the limits and potential for the use and application of different concepts drawing from a realist evaluation in understanding why, how, and for whom and in what context they work for HiAP. Illustrative case studies focus on the substance and provide examples from work with Ministries of Finance, Employment and Education. HiAP can be seen as a flexible overarching approach, which provides scope for action through several concepts and practices for intersectoral work. The comparison shows that definitions matter to the practice of HiAP concerning priorities, ideological premises, and level of governance. Ministries of Finance are crucial for action on equity and social determinants of health. HiAP requires understanding of health policy priorities and competences and capacities in public health and health systems governance as well as in analysis of politics, power, and different contexts of policymaking under multilevel governance. While HiAP aims to ensure health priorities in decision-making of all policies, if and how this is realized, is a political choice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.