Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859915›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of public health2026

The health and care workforce crisis: co-benefits of gender-transformative approaches and capacities for implementation.

Ellen Kuhlmann, Katarzyna Czabanowska, Gabriela Lotta, Ligia Paina, Abi Sriharan

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ellen KuhlmannInstitute for Economics, Labour and Culture, Goethe-University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Katarzyna CzabanowskaCare and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Department of International Health, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3934-5589
Gabriela LottaGetulio Vargas Foundation, Sao Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2801-1628
Ligia PainaJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Abi SriharanKrembil Centre for Health Management and Leadership, Schulich School of Business, York University, York, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The health and care workforce crisis and gender inequalities are interconnected, threatening healthcare and equity. We turn this 'unhealthy' connection upside down, aiming to explore how health policy can create co-benefits for gender equality and how governance can support policy implementation. A conceptual approach on SDG3 'Health' and SDG5 'Gender Equality' co-benefits served our analysis. We applied a qualitative explorative approach to identify co-benefits; following a rapid scoping review of the literature, we focus on document analysis and an illustrative case study of artificial intelligence in the health and care workforce. The literature reveals an overall lack of attention to co-benefits in research. Policy documents pay some attention to co-benefits, but primarily consider the benefits for the healthcare sector rather than for gender equality. The case of artificial intelligence illustrates that technological innovations provide opportunities for change, but to create co-benefits, they need gender-responsive and equity-based policy approaches to enhance economically effective and socially fair transformations. We discuss how transformational leadership and gender-transformative governance approaches can support implementation of co-benefits policies. Strengthening the policy and implementation of co-benefits provides novel opportunities for improving gender equality and responding to the health and care workforce crisis.

Indexed as

Gender EquityHealth PolicyHealth WorkforceArtificial IntelligenceFemaleHumansMaleQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID41859915
PMCPMC13017315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.