ArticleStatistics in medicine2026
Analysis of Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials: A Tutorial Using Marginal Models.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Finite-Sample Adjustments in Estimating Equations for Correlated Overdispersed Count Outcomes With Application to Cluster Randomized Trials.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- Using the NIH Research Methods Resources Website.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials (SW-CRTs) are one-way crossover trials that randomize clusters (i.e., groups) of individuals to the time point (period) at which an intervention is introduced into the cluster. In these designs, the intervention under evaluation is introduced into all of the clusters by the end of the study in a series of "steps." Analysis of SW-CRTs using marginal models provides a population-averaged interpretation of the estimated intervention effect and flexible specification of the within-cluster, marginal pairwise association structure; the latter has practical application in reporting intraclass (i.e., pairwise) correlations and calculating power for CRTs. Despite these features, use of marginal modeling of SW-CRTs has been mostly limited to applications with working independence and simple exchangeable correlation structures that are suboptimal for multi-period CRTs when correlation among responses decays over time. However, there have been many methodological developments in marginal modeling of SW-CRTs over the past fifteen years, particularly on (i) multi-parameter, within-cluster correlation structures; (ii) paired generalized estimating equations (GEE) for simultaneous estimation of mean and correlation parameters with standard errors; and, when the number of clusters is small, (iii) corrections to reduce the bias of variance estimators, and that of correlation estimates using matrix-adjusted estimating equations (MAEE). The goal of the current tutorial is to survey these newer developments and to provide case studies to enable applied researchers to implement GEE/MAEE for marginal model analysis of SW-CRTs, with application to both cohorts and designs with repeated cross-sectional samples. The methods are also applicable to multi-period, parallel-arm and cluster-crossover CRTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.