Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859848›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2026

Impact of the pandemic on sexual function: A comparative study between women of reproductive age and postmenopausal women.

Lyana Belém Marinho, Letícia Rodrigues Silva, Wanessa Silva de Oliveira, Ana Beatriz Bezerra, Carolina Assunção Macedo Tostes, Vanessa Santos Pereira Baldon

Abstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Editorial: Menopause and mental health.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lyana Belém MarinhoDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8237-2243
Letícia Rodrigues SilvaDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7662-4894
Wanessa Silva de OliveiraDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2270-911X
Ana Beatriz BezerraDepartment of Physiotherapy, Centro Universitário Doutor Leão Sampaio, Juazeiro do Norte, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0099-8427
Carolina Assunção Macedo TostesDepartment of Physiotherapy, Centro Universitário Doutor Leão Sampaio, Juazeiro do Norte, Brazil.
Vanessa Santos Pereira BaldonDepartment of Physiotherapy, Universidade Federal de Uberlândia, Uberlândia, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9948-8821

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study evaluates the sexual function of Brazilian women of reproductive age and postmenopausal women during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsA cross-sectional observational study was conducted virtually between 2020 and 2021, involving 200 sexually active women, divided into two groups: 100 women of reproductive age (WRA) and 100 postmenopausal women (PMW, amenorrhea for at least 12 consecutive months). Sexual function was assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI). Comparisons between groups were performed using the Mann-Whitney test, with a significance level of 5%.

resultsNo significant differences were observed between the groups in the total FSFI score (WRA: 17.29 ± 6.22; PMW: 17.38 ± 9.89). However, the WRA group had significantly higher scores in the desire domain (P < 0.001), while the PMW group showed higher scores in the sexual arousal (P = 0.015) and satisfaction (P < 0.001) domains. No significant differences were found in the other domains.

conclusionDuring the pandemic, both Brazilian women of reproductive age and postmenopausal women experienced impaired sexual function, as evidenced by reduced FSFI scores.

Indexed as

COVID-19PostmenopauseSexual BehaviorSexual Dysfunction, PhysiologicalAdultBrazilCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Young AdultCOVID‐19postmenopauseSARS‐CoV‐2sexual function

Identifiers

PMID41859848
PMCPMC13505210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.