ReviewInternational endodontic journal2026
When Novelty Outpaces Evidence: Social Media as an Unregulated Force Propelling Innovation in Endodontics: A Narrative Review.
Review in International endodontic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis narrative review explores how social media is influencing the pathways of innovation within endodontics, examines the rise of influencer-led clinical authority, and investigates the ethical, educational, and regulatory challenges associated with this trend, advocating for a comprehensive framework for responsible innovation. SUMMARY: Social media platforms have undergone a remarkable transformation, evolving from mere channels for informal communication to formidable agents of clinical influence in the healthcare field. Dentistry, and endodontics in particular, has seen platforms such as Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok increasingly serving as conduits for innovation. These platforms facilitate the rapid dissemination of new techniques, groundbreaking devices, and streamlined workflows, often circumventing traditional academic and regulatory structures that traditionally oversee and govern the spread of dental information. This shift has broadened accessibility to a wide range of ideas, promoting global engagement among dental professionals and patients alike. However, the unregulated media has also introduced considerable risks as the growing emphasis on visual appeal, rapid content production, and trendy innovations often overshadows the essential principles of biological plausibility, evidence-based validation, and consideration of long-term patient outcomes. Such dynamics raise critical questions about the reliability and safety of the information being shared on social media and the training and competence of the authors.
conclusionsSocial media is increasingly shaping the perception and adoption of endodontic innovations beyond traditional academic governance. Influencer-driven content often lacks transparent citations, robust critical appraisal, and an adequate discussion of clinical limitations. Advanced techniques may be advocated without proper consideration of operator competence, requisite training, or necessary armamentarium. Commercial interests and patient expectations can expedite the premature adoption of innovations that are inadequately validated. Applying frameworks of responsible research and innovation can provide a balanced perspective on integrating innovation, education, and patient safety in the field of endodontics. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Social media may influence how endodontic innovations are perceived and adopted in routine practice. Clinicians must engage in critical appraisal of online content, especially when techniques surpass their training or available resources, to mitigate the risk of inappropriate implementations and safeguard patient well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.