ReviewLancet regional health. Americas2026
Tree cover loss in the Americas: a critical indicator linking climate mitigation and planetary health.
Review in Lancet regional health. Americas, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Trees and forests are vital carbon sinks and essential resources for communities across the Americas, yet persistent tree cover loss threatens climate stability and human health. Between 2001 and 2022, global tree cover loss exceeded 459 million hectares, with 40% occurring since the Paris Agreement. Grounded in the Planetary Health framework, this Viewpoint presents tree cover loss as a sentinel indicator linking climate mitigation failures to health outcomes. Our conceptual framework identifies five interconnected pathways: climate regulation disruption, ecosystem service degradation, livelihood and resource loss, infectious disease risk alteration, and cultural-psychosocial impacts. These pathways disproportionately burden Indigenous communities and lower-income populations who contribute least to deforestation. We outline opportunities for cross-boundary conservation approaches recognising Indigenous land rights, enhanced monitoring systems, and agricultural policies delivering climate-health co-benefits. By framing tree cover loss as both an environmental and public health emergency, this framework guides more effective and equitable interventions across the region.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.