ArticleMedEdPublish (2016)2025
Exploring the Impact of Professional Acting on Empathy Development in Medical Students.
Article in MedEdPublish (2016), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Empathy is central to patient-centred care and professional identity, yet medical students' empathy often declines as they transition into clinical training. Theatre-based, arts-and-humanities interventions have been proposed to support empathic communication, but are usually evaluated with self-report rather than performance-based measures. Methods: We conducted a single-institution, single-group pre-post pilot evaluation of an extracurricular, four-week theatre-based empathy programme for third-year medical students. All 60 students were eligible; 18 volunteered on a first-come, first-served basis, and 12 who attended all eight sessions and completed both assessments formed the analytic sample. The programme, co-facilitated by a professional actor and clinician, was grounded in Kolb's experiential learning cycle and applied theatre principles. Teaching methods included repeated doctor-patient role-plays in breaking-bad-news scenarios, alternating doctor/patient perspectives, and structured feedback on communication and emotional presence. Observable empathic communication behaviours in simulated consultations were measured before and after the programme using the Empathetic Communication Assessment Form (five domains, 10-point scale), rated by the faculty member and actor. Pre-post differences were analysed with paired-samples t-tests and within-subject effect sizes (Cohen's d). Results: Students (n = 12) showed significant improvements across all domains. Mean increases ranged from +1.3 to +2.6 points on the 10-point scale, with large effect sizes (Cohen's d ≈ 1.5-2.8). The largest gains were in Empathetic Communication (+2.2), Relating to the Listener (+2.6) and Verbal Communication (+2.4). All students improved in their overall checklist score (range +0.8 to +3.1). Conclusions: This small, single-group pilot suggests that a brief, theatre-based, pre-clerkship programme co-facilitated by a professional actor and clinician may enhance observable empathic communication behaviours in simulated breaking-bad-news encounters. Although limited by the small, self-selected sample and absence of a control group, the findings support further, larger-scale and longitudinal evaluation of theatre-based empathy teaching within arts-and-humanities-informed medical curricula.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.