ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026
Long-term efficacy and safety of Control-IQ technology in younger children with type 1 diabetes in Italy (2020-2023): a longitudinal multicentre real-world study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Postprandial Glycemic Control With Automated Insulin Delivery With Control-IQ Technology: The Impact of Meal Composition.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems have demonstrated significant improvements in glycemic control in children and adults with type 1 diabetes, but long-term real-world data in preschool-aged children remain limited, particularly in Europe, where Control-IQ is not approved for children under 6 years. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of the t:slim X2 insulin pump with Control-IQ technology in children aged 0.5-5 years compared with those aged 6-10 years in a real-world multicenter Italian cohort. Methods: In this longitudinal, observational study conducted from 2020 to 2023, data were collected from 32 Italian centers on children <11 years diagnosed with type 1 diabetes for at least six months and using the t:slim X2 with Control-IQ technology (CIQ). Participants were grouped into 0.5-5 years or 6-10 years at CIQ initiation. Primary endpoints were the percentage of time spent in range (TIR, 70-180 mg/dL) and in tight range (TITR, 70-140 mg/dL) in the two age groups, evaluated according to children's demographic, socioeconomic, and clinical characteristics using mixed-effects models for repeated measures. Findings: We evaluated 253 children with 18-month follow-up, 131 into the 0.5-5-year group and 122 in the 6-10-year group. In the 0.5-5-year group, TIR and TITR increased significantly from baseline to 6 months and were then maintained through 18 months. In the 6-10-year group, similar improvements were observed, with no statistically significant differences between age groups in the TIR or TITR trajectories. In the adjusted mixed-effects models, TIR increased from baseline to 6 months by 5.45% (95% CI 3.78-7.11) and TITR increased by 5.56% (95% CI 3.60-7.51), with stabilization thereafter. Children of parents with a high level of education had a significantly greater mean TIR. A longer interval between T1D diagnosis and CIQ initiation was associated with a lower mean TITR (-1.21%, 95% CI -2.32 to -0.10). During observation, there were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia in younger children and only one episode in a 6-10-year-old. One episode of DKA occurred after the start of CIQ in a younger child. Interpretation: CIQ was associated with sustained improvements in glycemic outcomes, especially within the first six months. Adverse events were rare. These findings support potential supervised off-label use in young children. Funding: No specific funds were received for this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.