ArticleCureus2026
Artificial Intelligence in Kidney Stone Imaging: Enhancing Classification and Detection for Improved Diagnostic Accuracy.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents an advanced artificial intelligence (AI) model designed to accurately classify and detect kidney stones using medical imaging. Leveraging cloud-based computational resources, the model was trained to differentiate between stone-containing and normal kidneys while simultaneously identifying the precise localization of stones within images. The dataset consisted of 6,720 radiologic images representing clinically relevant stone cases and normal renal anatomy, with an 80-10-10 split for training, validation, and testing to ensure reliable assessment. Notably, the model achieved exceptional diagnostic performance, reflected by an average precision of 1.00 and both precision and recall reaching 99.9%. A perfect confusion matrix, demonstrating 100% correct classification of both stone and non-stone images, further underscores the robustness of the model. Model development required no physical hardware investment due to the use of cloud infrastructure, ensuring a cost-efficient and environmentally sustainable workflow. While results demonstrate strong clinical potential for automated nephrolithiasis detection, further evaluation on larger, multi-institutional datasets and across varied imaging modalities is recommended to strengthen generalizability. This work highlights the growing role of AI-enhanced diagnostic tools in urologic imaging, offering the promise of faster interpretation, improved workflow efficiency, and earlier identification of kidney stone disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.