ArticleCureus2026
Conjunctival Intraepithelial Neoplasia With IgG and Complement Deposition: Spurious Association or Biologically Explainable?
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conjunctival intraepithelial squamous neoplasia (CIN) is a premalignant ocular surface lesion typically diagnosed by clinical features and confirmed with routine histopathologic examination, rather than immunofluorescence studies. Direct immunofluorescence (DIF) of conjunctival tissue is most commonly used to support the diagnosis of autoimmune blistering diseases, particularly mucous membrane pemphigoid, by identifying immunoreactant deposition along the basement membrane zone (BMZ). However, such findings are not expected in CIN and may complicate interpretation. We report a case of CIN with unexpected positive DIF findings of IgG and C3 in the BMZ. A 63-year-old man with a clinically apparent conjunctival lesion underwent biopsy, which confirmed CIN on routine histopathology. A portion of the specimen was inadvertently submitted for DIF, revealing linear deposition of IgG and C3 along the conjunctival BMZ. The patient had no clinical history or examination findings suggestive of mucous membrane pemphigoid, other autoimmune blistering disease, or systemic inflammatory disorder that could account for these immunoreactant deposits. This association suggests nonspecific deposition of immunoglobulins and complement in the setting of conjunctival neoplasia, a phenomenon rarely reported in the literature. This case highlights the potential for false-positive DIF results in conjunctival lesions and emphasizes the importance of submitting a concomitant biopsy for routine light microscopy when ordering DIF in patients with suspected mucous membrane pemphigoid to ensure accurate diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.