Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859575›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Video-Assisted Learning for Oral Health Knowledge in Children: A Pre-post Intervention Study.

Beatriz Miguel, José Pedro Mendes, Giulia Ober

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Beatriz MiguelFamily Medicine, Family Health Unit Oriente, Saint Joseph's Local Health Unit, Lisbon, PRT.
José Pedro MendesFamily Medicine, Family Health Unit Oriente, Saint Joseph's Local Health Unit, Lisbon, PRT.
Giulia OberFamily Medicine, Family Health Unit Oriente, Saint Joseph's Local Health Unit, Lisbon, PRT.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Tooth decay is a common childhood disease. There is growing recognition of the value of community-based, personalised, and digitally driven interventions in enhancing oral healthcare. Methodology One hundred and fifty-five students from two schools with the highest "decayed, missing, and filled teeth (DMFT)" indices in Lisbon were selected. The intervention consisted of a four-week program featuring educational videos on oral health (tooth structure, hygiene, diet, and diseases), with pre-, post-intervention, and three-month follow-up assessments. The sessions were facilitated by family medicine resident doctors, oral health hygienists, and teachers. Children who did not complete the program were excluded. Guardian-informed consent was obtained. The data was anonymised. Statistical analysis included repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) and McNemar tests. Results A hundred and eight children were included (mean age 9.24 ± 0.75 years, range 8 - 11). After the intervention, the proportions of children brushing two to three times/day and flossing daily increased (from 77.8% to 85.2% and from 42.6% to 49.1%, respectively). From baseline, the mean dental health knowledge score improved by 1.77 points after the intervention [9.47 to 11.24/13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.21 - 1.32, p < 0.01] and by 0.52 points at follow-up (9.47 to 9.99, 95%CI 0.95 - 0.08, p = 0.014). Conclusion This video-based intervention enhanced student engagement with oral health content while providing valuable insights into the effectiveness of digital education in promoting better oral health knowledge among children.

Indexed as

health knowledgeoral healthoral health behavioursschool childrenvideo assisted learning

Identifiers

PMID41859575
PMCPMC12996842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.