Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859509›Full record

ArticleChemical science2026

DP5 without DFT: uncertainty-calibrated graph neural net accelerates structure confirmation

Ruslan Kotlyarov, Alexander Howarth, Jonathan M Goodman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ruslan KotlyarovYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry Lensfield Road Cambridge CB2 1EW UK jmg11@cam.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2519-2358
Alexander HowarthYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry Lensfield Road Cambridge CB2 1EW UK jmg11@cam.ac.uk.
Jonathan M GoodmanYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry Lensfield Road Cambridge CB2 1EW UK jmg11@cam.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8693-9136

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evaluation and assignment of candidate structures to NMR spectra can be facilitated by the DP4 method, which assumes that one of the candidate structures is correct, and the DP5 method, which calculates the probability of a correct assignment for each candidate individually. Both of these methods require DFT calculations and thus a significant amount of computer resources. In this paper we present DP5q, a new version of DP5, which uses a graph convolutional neural network and quantile regression to replace the DFT-based algorithm. This dramatically increases the speed of the calculation at the cost of a modest decrease in accuracy. We demonstrate the efficacy of this rapid calculation both on a test set of thousands of molecules and also on cases selected for the difficulty of assigning the structure.

Identifiers

PMID41859509
PMCPMC12997274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.