Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859502›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026

Jet Cold Plasma at Atmospheric Air Pressure for Venous Ulcers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Angel Henares, Sonia Villajos, Antonio Tejera, Lucía Gutiérrez, Iñigo Arroyo, Naroa Moreno, Ignacio Leal, Loreto Rubio, Javier Buendía, José Lasso and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cold Atmospheric Plasma in Wound Healing: Molecular Mechanism of Action.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Angel HenaresFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Sonia VillajosHospital Universitario La Mancha Centro, Unidad de Heridas, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Antonio TejeraHospital Universitario La Mancha Centro, Unidad de Heridas, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Lucía GutiérrezHospital Universitario La Mancha Centro, Unidad de Heridas, Ciudad Real, Spain.
Iñigo ArroyoFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Naroa MorenoFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Ignacio LealFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Loreto RubioFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Javier BuendíaDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
José LassoDepartment of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.
Ana Megía-MacíasMechanical Engineering Department, Superior Industrial School of Engineering, Comillas Pontifical University, Madrid, Spain.
Osvaldo-Daniel CortázarInstitute of Technological Research, Comillas Pontifical University, Madrid, Spain.
Bernardo HontanillaFrom the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: This prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of air-based cold atmospheric plasma jet (CAPJ) therapy for chronic venous leg ulcers (VLUs) compared with standard of care (SOC). Methods: Sixty adult patients with nonhealing VLUs were randomized to receive either CAPJ therapy twice weekly for 10 weeks or SOC. The primary outcome was the percentage reduction in wound area at weeks 4, 9, and 17. Secondary outcomes included granulation tissue formation, microbial burden (qualitative and quantitative), pain (visual analog scale), aesthetic satisfaction, and adverse events. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: Both groups demonstrated progressive reductions in wound area over time. Although the CAPJ group exhibited a greater mean reduction (-72.9% versus -56.7% at week 17), the difference was not statistically significant ( Conclusions: Although not statistically superior to SOC, air CAPJ therapy resulted in clinically meaningful wound area reduction, rapid antimicrobial effects, and high patient acceptability without increased adverse events. These findings support further investigation of CAPJ as a safe, noninvasive therapy for chronic VLU management.

Identifiers

PMID41859502
PMCPMC12999164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.