ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Jet Cold Plasma at Atmospheric Air Pressure for Venous Ulcers: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cold Atmospheric Plasma in Wound Healing: Molecular Mechanism of Action.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Plasma-treated alginate hydrogels modulate porcine leukocyte activityFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter clinical trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of air-based cold atmospheric plasma jet (CAPJ) therapy for chronic venous leg ulcers (VLUs) compared with standard of care (SOC). Methods: Sixty adult patients with nonhealing VLUs were randomized to receive either CAPJ therapy twice weekly for 10 weeks or SOC. The primary outcome was the percentage reduction in wound area at weeks 4, 9, and 17. Secondary outcomes included granulation tissue formation, microbial burden (qualitative and quantitative), pain (visual analog scale), aesthetic satisfaction, and adverse events. Analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: Both groups demonstrated progressive reductions in wound area over time. Although the CAPJ group exhibited a greater mean reduction (-72.9% versus -56.7% at week 17), the difference was not statistically significant ( Conclusions: Although not statistically superior to SOC, air CAPJ therapy resulted in clinically meaningful wound area reduction, rapid antimicrobial effects, and high patient acceptability without increased adverse events. These findings support further investigation of CAPJ as a safe, noninvasive therapy for chronic VLU management.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.