Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41859482›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026

Frontal plane sloped support surfaces: their effect on body balance and posture organization.

Alain Hamaoui, Siripatra Atsawakaewmongkhon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alain HamaouiCIAMS, Université Paris Saclay, Orsay, France.
Siripatra AtsawakaewmongkhonDepartment of Physical Therapy, School of Integrative Medicine, Mae Fah Luang University, Chiang Rai, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Sloped surfaces are common in daily life, as ground surfaces are frequently inclined for purposes such as accessibility, transportation, and drainage. This study assessed how support surfaces inclined in the frontal plane might affect body balance and posture. Methods: Fifteen subjects underwent a posturographic examination with the support surface sloped at 0°, 7°, and 15°. The tests were associated with goniometric measurements of knees and hips, and surface EMG of the Tibialis Anterior, Soleus, Rectus Femoris, and Biceps Femoris. Results: It has been shown that standing on a lateral sloped surface shifts the CP toward the direction of the slope and increases the CP velocity and mean displacement. Goniometric data revealed that the knees and ankles were flexed on the contralateral side of the slope, with a higher activity of the Rectus Femoris and Tibialis Anterior. Discussion: From the main findings, it was assumed that surfaces inclined in the frontal plane result in poorer body balance and increased fall risk. This might have significant implications in rehabilitation and accessibility.

Indexed as

articular anglesbody balanceEMGlower limbssloped surface

Identifiers

PMID41859482
PMCPMC12996055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.