ReviewEye and brain2026
Artificial Intelligence in Neuro-Ophthalmology for Optic Disc Pathologies and Neurodegenerative Disease.
Review in Eye and brain, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly reshaping neuro-ophthalmic care by extracting clinically significant information from imaging, biomarkers, and patient-level clinical data. We review recent advances across neurodegenerative disease detection using retinal biomarkers, automated recognition of optic disc swelling and its mimics, glaucoma screening and quantification, and classification of hereditary optic neuropathies. Using fundus photography and optical coherence tomography (OCT), contemporary machine learning (ML) systems, including deep learning as well as other supervised learning models, report strong discrimination for papilledema versus pseudopapilledema, non-arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION) against similar presenting entities, and glaucomatous damage including indirect estimation of retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness. Early work also suggests that retinal features can aid detection of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and major neurocognitive disease. However, despite promising results, most studies remain retrospective and single-center, while focusing on imaging-only, limiting generalizability and clinical interpretability. Therefore a variety of challenges related to dataset heterogeneity, overfitting, limited external validation, and the gap between high diagnostic accuracy and practical clinical utility remain unresolved. Future prospective, multicenter evaluations focusing on integrating multimodal clinical data through explainable AI systems are necessary to improve diagnostic consistency, shorten time to care, and expand access for underserved populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.