ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2026
Real-world effectiveness and predictors of treatment failure for eravacycline in patients with
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-world safety profile of eravacycline compared with tigecycline, minocycline, and meropenem: a comparative pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Eravacycline as a Novel Option for Treating Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative and Gram-Positive Bacterial Infections: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Eravacycline in Critically Ill Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections: A Real-World Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Beyond β-Lactams: Defining the Role of Eravacycline in Multidrug-Resistant and Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Eravacycline (ERV) is a novel synthetic fluorocycline antibiotic with broad-spectrum antibacterial efficacy against pathogens. This study aimed to investigate the clinical effectiveness of eravacycline and its correlation with minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) against infections caused by Methods: This retrospective multicenter study investigated the real-world use of ERV in 1,796 adults with infection caused by Results: The overall susceptibility rate to ERV was 96.0% (1,027/1,070), and around 98% of carbapenem-resistant isolates were susceptible to ERV. ERV had a 4-fold lower MIC Conclusions: The study highlights ERV's utility in infection of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.