ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2026
Wheat mycobiome dynamics driven by interseasonal crop-crop transfer and Fusarium head blight.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Fusarium head blight (FHB) is a devastating disease of wheat that causes mycotoxin contamination in grains. Diseases like FHB have traditionally been managed with integrated strategies; but this has led to a proliferation of fungicide-resistant pathogens and soil erosion while full disease control has remained elusive. Leveraging the microbiome for more sustainable management is an alternative, however, translation of promising strategies is hampered by our limited understanding of crop microbiome differences across plant development and tissue types. Methods: We characterized fungal communities using amplicon sequencing across five developmental timepoints in wheat leaves and wheat heads, as well as in maize debris from the previous growing season. Samples were collected from two locations in Illinois, USA. We assessed how tissue type, site, developmental stage, and wheat variety contributed to mycobiome composition. Source-sink relationships among debris, leaves, and heads were evaluated, and taxa associated with high and low FHB conditions were identified. Network analyses were used to determine the roles of key fungal taxa in wheat head and maize debris microbiomes. Results: Mycobiome composition varied strongly by tissue type, though site and developmental timepoint were also important contributors. Host variety conditionally explained mycobiome variation in wheat heads, but not in leaves or debris. We also identified debris as a major fungal source to leaves early in development, but not later-and found that leaves were never a large inoculum source to head mycobiomes at either developmental stage tested. Taxa enriched under high FHB conditions in wheat heads belonged to the Ascomycota ( Discussion: This work shows that fungal movement from crop to crop across seasons, and between plant tissues within a season, shape phyllosphere microbiome dynamics and can indicate potential disease outcomes in the FHB pathosystem. As microbiome-based disease management develops alongside rapid growth in the biologicals industry and increased recognition of microbial roles in agriculture, this work highlights several promising directions. These include identifying basidiomycetous yeasts associated with low FHB, pinpointing taxa correlated with Fusarium in wheat heads and maize debris, and demonstrating that applying biocontrols to wheat leaves is unlikely to affect pathogen spread to heads. Future research should focus on controlled tests of microbe-microbe interactions and their impacts on plant immunity, disease suppression, and yield.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.