ArticleFrontiers in neurology
Cervicomedullary motor evoked responses in individuals with severe chronic hemiparesis post-stroke: a feasibility study.
Article in Frontiers in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the neural mechanisms underlying upper limb motor recovery after stroke remains a significant challenge in rehabilitation research. It has been proposed that individuals who show no motor-evoked potential (MEP) response to transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) and are thus classified as MEP negative (MEP-) have limited potential for recovery in part due to damage of the corticospinal pathway. In this study, we investigate how individuals categorized as MEP- with TMS respond to stimulation of the corticospinal pathway at a subcortical level. We describe the methodology for eliciting MEPs by using cervicomedullary electrical stimulation (CMEP) in post-stroke individuals with severe upper limb hemiparesis. MEP status (+/-) of the more affected arm was assessed using TMS and cervicomedullary electrical stimulation in stroke survivors with severe upper extremity hemiparesis. While most of the participants were classified as MEP-, all individuals were categorized as CMEP+ in the biceps brachii, extensor carpi radialis, and first dorsal interosseous muscles. Importantly, we report the first testing of CMEPs in a small cohort of individuals with stroke. This technique is feasible in this population and has potential for application in clinical translation settings. Our findings provide a foundation for future studies to replicate and expand upon this approach, enabling the exploration of new hypotheses related to post-stroke rehabilitation and recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.